Bomer, Dworin, May, & Semingson argue that when one analyzes the content of Ruby Payne’s work, it is easy to see that the work was conducted using a deficit perspective. Specifically, these authors assert, “when we first became acquainted with Payne’s work, it seemed to us that her ‘framework’ included negative stereotypes that drew from a longstanding US tradition of viewing the poor from a deficit perspective.” The use of a deficit perspective when informing educators how one should work with a group of students can lead to a cycle in which students are viewed as stereotypes rather than individuals; and in which the teacher perpetuates the stereotype.
In order to provide a balanced perspective, please review Ruby Payne’s “Understanding and Working with Adults in Poverty.” It will provide an overview of Ruby Payne’s “Framework for Understanding Poverty” so that you will gain some background knowledge on the framework that is being critiqued.
Considering this argument, please discuss the following:
Reading/Author | The Author(s) Said… | I Say… |
1.) Thompson, A.(pp. 12-13) | Thompson states that “the experience of disability is more complex and dynamic than the representations of disability. In fact, she suggests that individuals with disabilities negotiate a number of things in the social encounter that people without disabilities never consider.” | I agree with this statement of the experience of disability. I personally believe that the representations of disability presented by various media outlets fail to adequately depict the robust nature the experiences of a person with a disability. These images contribute significantly to the pervasive deficit perspective that is often applied to such individuals. That said, a person with a disability must always be conscious of their exceptionality and how it impacts/informs their interactions with others. |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more