Rubric4.doc

RTT1 Task 2 (0315)

value: 0.00

value: 1.00

value: 2.00

value: 3.00

value: 4.00

Score/Level

Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)

The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.

The candidate provides weak articulation of response.

The candidate provides limited articulation of response.

The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.

The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.

 

A. Root Cause Analysis

The candidate does not complete an appropriate root cause analysis (RCA) that takes into consideration causative factors, errors, and/or hazards that led to the sentinel event (this patient’s outcome).

The candidate completes an appropriate root cause analysis (RCA), with no detail, that takes into consideration causative factors, errors, and/or hazards that led to the sentinel event (this patient’s outcome).

The candidate completes an appropriate root cause analysis (RCA), with limited detail, that takes into consideration causative factors, errors, and/or hazards that led to the sentinel event (this patient’s outcome).

The candidate completes an appropriate root cause analysis (RCA), with adequate detail, that takes into consideration causative factors, errors, and/or hazards that led to the sentinel event (this patient’s outcome).

The candidate completes an appropriate root cause analysis (RCA), with substantial detail, that takes into consideration causative factors, errors, and/or hazards that led to the sentinel event (this patient’s outcome).

 

B. Improvement Plan

The candidate does not discuss a process improvement plan that would decrease the likelihood of a reoccurrence of the outcome of the scenario

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of a process improvement plan that would decrease the likelihood of a reoccurrence of the outcome of the scenario

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of a process improvement plan that would decrease the likelihood of a reoccurrence of the outcome of the scenario

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of a process improvement plan that would decrease the likelihood of a reoccurrence of the outcome of the scenario.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of a process improvement plan that would decrease the likelihood of a reoccurrence of the outcome of the scenario

 

B1. Change Theory

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of a change theory that could be used to implement the process improvement plan developed in B.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of a change theory that could be used to implement the process improvement plan developed in B.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of a change theory that could be used to implement the process improvement plan developed in B.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of a change theory that could be used to implement the process improvement plan developed in B.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of a change theory that could be used to implement the process improvement plan developed in B.

 

C. FMEA

The candidate does not use a failure mode and effects analysis to project the likelihood that the process improvement plan suggested would not fail.

The candidate uses a failure mode and effects analysis, with no support, to project the likelihood that the process improvement plan suggested would not fail.

The candidate uses a failure mode and effects analysis, with limited support, to project the likelihood that the process improvement plan suggested would not fail.

The candidate uses a failure mode and effects analysis, with adequate support, to project the likelihood that the process improvement plan suggested would not fail.

The candidate uses a failure mode and effects analysis, with substantial support, to project the likelihood that the process improvement plan suggested would not fail.

 

C1. Members of the Interdisciplinary Team

The candidate does not accurately identify the members of the interdisciplinary team who will be included in the FMEA.

N/A

N/A

N/A

The candidate accurately identifies the members of the interdisciplinary team who will be included in the FMEA.

 

C2. Pre-Steps

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the steps for preparing for the FMEA.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of the steps for preparing for the FMEA.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the steps for preparing for the FMEA.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the steps for preparing for the FMEA.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of the steps for preparing for the FMEA.

 

C3. Three Steps

The candidate does not appropriately apply the 3 steps of the FMEA (severity, occurrence, and detection) to the process improvement plan created in part B.

The candidate appropriately applies, with no detail, the 3 steps of the FMEA (severity, occurrence, and detection) to the process improvement plan created in part B.

The candidate appropriately applies, with limited detail, the 3 steps of the FMEA (severity, occurrence, and detection) to the process improvement plan created in part B.

The candidate appropriately applies, with adequate detail, the 3 steps of the FMEA (severity, occurrence, and detection) to the process improvement plan created in part B.

The candidate appropriately applies, with substantial detail, the 3 steps of the FMEA (severity, occurrence, and detection) to the process improvement plan created in part B.

 

C4. Interventions

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how the candidate would test the interventions from the process improvement plan from part B to improve care in a similar situation.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no support, of how the candidate would test the interventions from the process improvement plan from part B to improve care in a similar situation.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited support, of how the candidate would test the interventions from the process improvement plan from part B to improve care in a similar situation.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate support, how the candidate would test the interventions from the process improvement plan from part B to improve care in a similar situation.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial support, of how the candidate would test the interventions from the process improvement plan from part B to improve care in a similar situation.

 

D. Key Role of Nurses

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how the professional nurse may function as a leader in promoting quality care and influencing quality improvement activities.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how the professional nurse may function as a leader in promoting quality care and influencing quality improvement activities.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how the professional nurse may function as a leader in promoting quality care and influencing quality improvement activities.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how the professional nurse may function as a leader in promoting quality care and influencing quality improvement activities.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how the professional nurse may function as a leader in promoting quality care and influencing quality improvement activities.

 

E. Sources

There is evidence of quoted, paraphrased or summarized content without acknowledgement of source information. This level is also appropriate if task instructions require the candidate to quote, paraphrase or summarize content from a source to complete the assessment, and this has not yet been done.

The candidate provides required acknowledgement of source information for quoted, paraphrased and summarized content. However, in-text citations and/or source information is incomplete or inaccurate with respect to author, date, title and the location of the information (e.g., publisher, journal or website URL).

N/A

N/A

The candidate provides source information for all quoted, paraphrased and summarized content. Source information appears to include accurate and complete acknowledgement of source information regarding the author, date, title and location of the information (e.g., publisher, journal or website URL) as well as appropriate in-text citation. This level is also appropriate if there is no evidence of quoted, paraphrased or summarized content, and it is not required by the instructions.