Order Legal Policy Short Discussion
Summarizes the issue in a one- sentence question
Summarizes the issue in a one- sentence question, but summary contains inaccuracies
Does not summarize the issue in a one-sentence question
Order Legal Policy Short Discussion
Short Answer Meets “Proficient” criteria and short answer is a succinct and clear su mmary of the conclusion
Provides a short answer t hat summarizes the conclusion of the paper
Provides a short answer t hat summarizes the conclusion of the paper, but summary lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
Does not provide a short answer t hat summarizes the conclusion of the paper
6
Statement of Facts Meets “Proficient” criteria substantiated with evidence to support description
Describes how the issue may negatively affect public perception of the criminal justice system
Describes how the issue may negatively affect public perception of the criminal justice system, but description lacks detail or c ontains inaccuracies
Does not describe how the issue may negatively affect public perception of the criminal justice system
12
Discussion Meets “Proficient” criteria substantiated with research to support discussion
Provides a discussion of the issue, including the recent history of the issue and any legal precedents related to it
Provides a discussion of the issue, but does not include the recent history of the issue or any legal precedents related to it
Does not provide a discussion of the issue
Order Legal Policy Short Discussion
Conclusion Meets “Proficient” criteria substantiated with evidence to support discussion
Provides a conclusion based on the details of the issue outlined in the Discussion section
Provides a conclusion based on the details of the issue outlined in the Discussion section, but conclusion lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
Does not provide a conclusion based on the details of the issue outlined in the Discussion section
12
Recommendations: Complexities
Meets “Proficient” criteria substantiated with evidence to support identification
Identifies complexities to proposing a solution to the chosen criminological issue
Identifies complexities to proposing a solution to the chosen criminological issue, but identified complexities contain inaccuracies
Does not identify the complexities to proposing a solution to the chosen criminological issue
12
http://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/cj/cj500/cj500_criminal_justice_library_tips.pdf
Recommendations: Immediate Actions
Meets “Proficient” criteria substantiated with citations from the course readings to support implementation of immediate a ctions
Identifies the immediate actions that need to be taken to implement the proposed solution and justifies the necessity and feasibility of these actions with evidence
Identifies immediate a ctions that need to be taken to implement the solution, but does not justify the necessity and feasibility of these actions with evidence, or j ustification lacks detail or c ontains inaccuracies
Does not identify the immediate actions that need to be taken to implement the solution
12
Recommendations: Necessary Data
Meets “Proficient” criteria substantiated with examples of data from research to support identification
Identifies the types of necessary data required to assess whether or not the proposed solution is successful in its implementation
Identifies the types of necessary data required to assess whether or not the solution is successful in its implementation, but identified data is inaccurate
Does not identify the types of necessary data required to assess whether or not the solution is successful in its implementation
12
Recommendations: Criminological Theory
Meets “Proficient” criteria substantiated with the course readings on criminological theory to support justification
Applies criminological theory to justify how the proposed solution will address the underlying causes of the issue
Applies criminological theory to justify how the proposed solution will address the underlying causes of the issue, but lacks detail or c ontains inaccuracies
Does not apply criminological theory to justify how the proposed solution will address the underlying causes of the issue
Order Legal Policy Short Discussion
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization, and is presented in a professional and easy to read format
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more