Problem-Solving Report about a real-life crime problem somewhere in Saudi Arabia or in the USI

Problem-Solving Report about a real-life crime problem somewhere in Saudi Arabia or in the USI

I choose Stolen cars in Chicago ( if you have a better idea you can change it)

introduction

The ePortfolio Project is a summative assessment, similar to an exam, that measures how well you have mastered the skills and knowledge presented in this course. With two weeks to complete, this is a chance for you to show your best work.

Task

In this task, you will submit the Problem-Solving Report that you have written over the preceding three weeks. In case you missed it, a copy of the required PSPAE Report Format is attached to this assignment.

Prompt: Compose an original Problem-Solving Report about a real-life crime problem somewhere in Saudi Arabia or in the US. Use the report format attached to this assignment.

Assessment

Your report will be assessed using the CILO 1-4 rubric shown here. All assessments will be completed by the course professor. This summative assessment is worth 15% of your course grade.

PROBLEM-SOLVING REPORT FORMAT
1
PROBLEM-SOLVING REPORT FORMAT
DR. MAMDOOH A. ABDELMOTTLEP
JANUARY 2021
Ideally, a Problem-Solving Report is akin to a decision memorandum. A Problem-Solving Report must be thoroughly researched and be richly accompanied by endnotes.
A good Problem-Solving Report will have the following parts.
1. Executive Summary
A short abstract of the paper content including all the Problem-Solving Report parts.
2. Problem Background
A. History of the Problem
B. Current Status of the Problem
C. Importance of the Problem
D. Definition of the Problem
Introduction to the problem. Keep it short and to the point. This section frames the issue.
3. Problem Statement
A. Identify the objectives of the entity that is trying to solve the problem and the Statement of the Problem
B. Statement of Methodology Used in Analysis
C. Identification of Actors Involved
D. Impact of the Problem
It concisely identifies the problem to be solved. It may be in the form of a question.
4. Alternative Solutions
A. Listing of Alternatives Considered
B. Comparison of Alternatives
PROBLEM-SOLVING REPORT FORMAT
2
C. Constraints, Including Political
Enumerate the options and describe them briefly. It is common to provide three options, but don’t force it to that. For and against arguments do not constitute two options. Give the decision-maker some choices.
4-D: Analysis of Options: How does each option serve the objectives listed above (3-A) and what are the other cost issues associated with each. Consider positive and negative externalities. You should be sensitive to the options’ domestic political repercussions.
5. Recommendations
A. Description Recommendation(s)
B. Rationale for Recommendations
C. Plan for Implementation
D. Provisions for Monitoring/Evaluation
Select the best option and recapitulate why it is the best. Do a reality check. Does the recommendation solve the problem; is it actionable? Your recommendation should ideally be a stand-alone, and not require another iteration of the process to figure out how to implement it. A good recommendation is never a suicide pact.
6. References
7. Appendices

3/22/2021 Rubric Detail – Problem Solving: Planning, Analysis and …
https://lms.kfsc.edu.sa/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_26246_1&course_id=_2517_1&maxValue=100.0… 1/3
Rubric Detail
Select
Grid View
or
List View
to change the rubric’s layout.
More Help
Unsatisfactory
Baseline
Developing
Good
Exempla
1.1Description
0
(0.00%)
-6.55555
(6.55554%)
No potentialproblemidenti?ed.
6.66666
(6.66666%)
-7.66666
(7.66665%)
One featureof apotentialproblemdiscussed.
7.77777
(7.77777%)
-8.77777
(8.77776%)
Describemultiplefeatures ofa potentialproblem
8.88888
(8.88888%)
-9.88888
(9.88887%)
…and explainconsequencesto stakeholders
9.99999
(9.99999%
11.1111
(11.1111%
…and disadministrconstraina?ecting engagem
1.2 Support
0
(0.00%)
-6.55555
(6.55554%)
No sourcescited.
6.66666
(6.66666%)
-7.66666
(7.66665%)
One sourcecited.
7.77777
(7.77777%)
-8.77777
(8.77776%)
Multiplesourcescited
8.88888
(8.88888%)
-9.88888
(9.88887%)
…and quality ofsourcesdescribed
9.99999
(9.99999%
11.1111
(11.1111%
…andrelevancesources tospeci?cs oproblemdiscussedproduce acoherentjusti?catio
2.1 Data
0
(0.00%)
-6.55555
(6.55554%)
6.66666
(6.66666%)
-7.66666
7.77777
(7.77777%)
-8.77777
8.88888
(8.88888%)
-9.88888
9.99999
(9.99999%
11.1111
Name:
Problem Solving: All CILOs
Description:
This rubric includes all CVILOs and should be used to assess the ePortfolioProject
Exit
Grid View
List View
3/22/2021 Rubric Detail – Problem Solving: Planning, Analysis and …
https://lms.kfsc.edu.sa/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_26246_1&course_id=_2517_1&maxValue=100.0… 2/3
Unsatisfactory
Baseline
Developing
Good
Exempla
No datasetsidenti?ed.
(7.66665%)
Identify onerelevantdataset.
(8.77776%)
Identifymultiplerelevantdatasets
(9.88887%)
…andaggregate intoa singlecoherent datastructure
(11.1111%
…and expquality wireferencemissing doutliers, arelevantmetadata
2.2Analysis
0
(0.00%)
-6.55555
(6.55554%)
No analyticalapproachidenti?ed.
6.66666
(6.66666%)
-7.66666
(7.66665%)
Describeoneanalyticalapproach.
7.77777
(7.77777%)
-8.77777
(8.77776%)
Describemultipleanalyticalapproaches
8.88888
(8.88888%)
-9.88888
(9.88887%)
…and generateappropriaterepresentationsof results
9.99999
(9.99999%
11.1111
(11.1111%
…describany patteandcorrelatiothe data.
3.1 Insight
0
(0.00%)
-6.55555
(6.55554%)
No insightsderived.
6.66666
(6.66666%)
-7.66666
(7.66665%)
One insightderivedfromanalysis
7.77777
(7.77777%)
-8.77777
(8.77776%)
Multipleinsightsderivedfromanalysis
8.88888
(8.88888%)
-9.88888
(9.88887%)
…andsupported withreference tothe literature
9.99999
(9.99999%
11.1111
(11.1111%
…and anylimitationdata oranalysis tmay a?ecvalidity ofinterpretadiscussed
3.2Proposal
0
(0.00%)
-6.55555
(6.55554%)
No planproposed.
6.66666
(6.66666%)
-7.66666
(7.66665%)
Plan withoneelementproposed.
7.77777
(7.77777%)
-8.77777
(8.77776%)
Plan withmultipleelementsproposed
8.88888
(8.88888%)
-9.88888
(9.88887%)
…that includesclearly detailedspeci?cations
9.99999
(9.99999%
11.1111
(11.1111%
…anddiscussesfeasibilitywithin conof MOI poandresourcin
4.1Cogency
0
(0.00%)
-6.55555
(6.55554%)
6.66666
(6.66666%)
-7.66666
7.77777
(7.77777%)
-8.77777
8.88888
(8.88888%)
-9.88888
9.99999
(9.99999%
11.1111
3/22/2021 Rubric Detail – Problem Solving: Planning, Analysis and …
https://lms.kfsc.edu.sa/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_26246_1&course_id=_2517_1&maxValue=100.0… 3/3
Unsatisfactory
Baseline
Developing
Good
Exempla
No apparentorganization ofideas.
(7.66665%)
One linkbetweenideas isclear.
(8.77776%)
Linksamongideas makemessageclear andeasy tofollow
(9.88887%)
…and providefocused,relevant,explanationand support tothe argument
(11.1111%
…and frathe argumwithin thecontext obroaderdiscourse
4.2Template
0
(0.00%)
-6.55555
(6.55554%)
No apparentobservance ofstandards.
6.66666
(6.66666%)
-7.66666
(7.66665%)
Irregularobservanceof a limitedrange ofstandards.
7.77777
(7.77777%)
-8.77777
(8.77776%)
Regularobservanceof allcommonstandards
8.88888
(8.88888%)
-9.88888
(9.88887%)
…withdemonstratedattention todetail
9.99999
(9.99999%
11.1111
(11.1111%
…and skiadaptatiospeci?ccontexts.
4.3 Style
0
(0.00%)
-6.55561
(6.5556%)
No apparentobservance ofstandardconventions offormal writtenstyle.
6.66672
(6.66672%)
-7.66673
(7.66672%)
Irregularobservanceof the mostobviousandcommonconventionsof formalwrittenstyle.
7.77784
(7.77784%)
-8.77785
(8.77784%)
Consistentobservanceof mostconventionsof formalwrittenstyle
8.88896
(8.88896%)
-9.88897
(9.88896%)
…with wordchoiceappropriate tothe intendedaudience
10.00008
(10.00008%
11.1112
(11.1112%
…andconstructdisplayingvariety,suitability?uency.
Name:
Problem Solving: All CILOs
Description:
This rubric includes all CVILOs and should be used to assess the ePortfolioProject
Exit